Re: [PATCH 0 of 11] Use SEEK_{SET,CUR,END} instead of hardcoded values

On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 01:46:23PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> >In July, David Howells added SEEK_{SET,CUR,END} definitions to 
> >include/linux/fs.h
> >
> >The following patches convert offenders which were found by grep'ing the 
> >source
> >tree.
> 
> Looks like a good change to me.
> 
> Nitpick, do you need 11 patches to do it? 1 would be fine, I think?

I don't. I just got carried away with Mercurial's patch queues support.

Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.

-- 
A computer without Microsoft is like chocolate cake without mustard.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0 of 11] Use SEEK_{SET,CUR,END} instead of hardcoded values
  - From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 11] Use SEEK_{SET,CUR,END} instead of hardcoded values
  - From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: PROBLEM: 2.4 oops: proc_pid_stat()
Next by Date: Re: Scheduler tunables?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0 of 11] Use SEEK_{SET,CUR,END} instead of hardcoded values
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0 of 11] Use SEEK_{SET,CUR,END} instead of hardcoded values
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]