On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 18:22 -0700, Rohit Seth wrote: <snip> > > > > Here are results of some of the benchmarks we have run in the past > > (April 2005) with CKRM which showed no/negligible performance impact in > > that scenario. > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ckrm-tech&m=111325064322305&w=2 > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ckrm-tech&m=111385973226267&w=2 > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ckrm-tech&m=111291409731929&w=2 > > > > > > These are good results. But I still think the cost will increase over a > period of time as more logic gets added. Any data on microbenchmarks IMO, overhead may not increase for a _non-user_ of the feature. > like lmbench. I think we have run those, but I could not find the results in the mailing list. > > > <snip> > > > > > > Not at all. If the container they are interested in is guaranteed, I do > > > > not see how apps running outside a container would affect them. > > > > > > > > > > Because the kernel (outside the container subsystem) doesn't know of > > > > The core resource subsystem (VM subsystem for memory) would know about > > the guarantees and don't cares, and it would handle it appropriately. > > > > ...meaning hooks in the generic kernel reclaim algorithm. Getting > something like that in mainline will be at best tricky. Yes, it does mean doing something in the reclamation path. > > > -rohit > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose.... - [email protected] | .......you may get it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Pavel Emelianov <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ltp] 2.6.18-rc6, SATA, resume from RAM
- Next by Date: Re: [Bug] 2.6.18-rc6-mm2 i386 trouble finding RSDT in get_memcfg_from_srat
- Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- Next by thread: Re: [Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
- Index(es):