Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes

> I guess that should be deleted then?

Yes. I will delete it right now. Thanks for the notice.
 
> Currently you remap signals. Whatever you do this for
> regparm(0) should also be done for regparm(3).

Not sure I parse you here. You're asking how to fix the regparm(3)
case?

-Andi


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes
    • From: "Albert Cahalan" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes
    • From: "Albert Cahalan" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes
    • From: "Albert Cahalan" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: support for limit of open file descriptors for a child process
• Next by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.18-rc6-mm1 (-mm2): ohci resume problem
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]