Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes

On Thursday 14 September 2006 10:34, Albert Cahalan wrote:

> For i386, the non-RT frame is wrong. It was using the raw sig value
> instead of the translated value, and did not pass the semi-documented
> extra parameters.

The translation is not needed because x86-64 doesn't support iBCS at all
and afaik it was only used for that.

>
> For x86-64, the regparm 3 calling convention was simply missing.

Ok that should be added.

Can you please send a single patch that just does this?

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes
    • From: "Albert Cahalan" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes
    • From: "Albert Cahalan" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/7] Alter get_order() so that it can make use of ilog2() on a constant [try #3]
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] mpparse.c:231: warning: comparison is always false
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]