Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:25:19 -0500
Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]> wrote:

> > +void journal_do_submit_data(struct buffer_head **wbuf, int bufs)
> 
> Is there any reason this couldn't be static?

Nope.

> > +{
> > +       int i;
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < bufs; i++) {
> > +               wbuf[i]->b_end_io = end_buffer_write_sync;
> > +               /* We use-up our safety reference in submit_bh() */
> > +               submit_bh(WRITE, wbuf[i]);
> > +       }
> > +} 
> 
> I'm rebasing the ext4 work on the latest -mm tree and would like to
> avoid renaming this function in the jbd2 clone.

<edits the diff>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: netdevice name corruption is still present in 2.6.18-rc6-mm1
• Next by Date: [PATCH 1/11] LTTng-core 0.5.108 : build
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]