On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:25:19 -0500 Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]> wrote: > > +void journal_do_submit_data(struct buffer_head **wbuf, int bufs) > > Is there any reason this couldn't be static? Nope. > > +{ > > + int i; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < bufs; i++) { > > + wbuf[i]->b_end_io = end_buffer_write_sync; > > + /* We use-up our safety reference in submit_bh() */ > > + submit_bh(WRITE, wbuf[i]); > > + } > > +} > > I'm rebasing the ext4 work on the latest -mm tree and would like to > avoid renaming this function in the jbd2 clone. <edits the diff> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- References:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- Prev by Date: Re: netdevice name corruption is still present in 2.6.18-rc6-mm1
- Next by Date: [PATCH 1/11] LTTng-core 0.5.108 : build
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- Index(es):