Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers

>   Ugh! Are you sure? For this path the buffer must be attached (only) to
> the running transaction. But then how the commit code comes to it?
> Somebody would have to even manage to refile the buffer from the
> committing transaction to the running one while the buffer is in wbuf[].
> Could you check whether someone does __journal_refile_buffer() on your
> marked buffers, please? Or whether we move buffer to BJ_Locked list in
> the write_out_data: loop? Thanks.
> 
> 							

I added more debug in __journal_refile_buffer() to see if the marked
buffers are getting refiled. I am able to reproduce the problem,
but I don't see any debug including my original prints. (It looks as 
if none of my debug code exists) - its really confusing. 

I will keep looking and get back to you.

I may try Andrew's buffer debug patch - if I get desperate.

Thanks,
Badari

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Anton Altaparmakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] request_firmware examples and MODULE_FIRMWARE
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1: strange /proc/interrupts contents on HPC nx6325
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]