> Ugh! Are you sure? For this path the buffer must be attached (only) to > the running transaction. But then how the commit code comes to it? > Somebody would have to even manage to refile the buffer from the > committing transaction to the running one while the buffer is in wbuf[]. > Could you check whether someone does __journal_refile_buffer() on your > marked buffers, please? Or whether we move buffer to BJ_Locked list in > the write_out_data: loop? Thanks. > > I added more debug in __journal_refile_buffer() to see if the marked buffers are getting refiled. I am able to reproduce the problem, but I don't see any debug including my original prints. (It looks as if none of my debug code exists) - its really confusing. I will keep looking and get back to you. I may try Andrew's buffer debug patch - if I get desperate. Thanks, Badari - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Anton Altaparmakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] request_firmware examples and MODULE_FIRMWARE
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1: strange /proc/interrupts contents on HPC nx6325
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- Index(es):