Re: [PATCH 2/2] new bd_mutex lockdep annotation

Peter Zijlstra wrote:

Use the gendisk partition number to set a lock class.

I like this approach a whole better than what is there today (but we talked about that before ;)
It's a lot more obviously the right approach and kills a whole lot of ugly duplication

so

Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/2] new bd_mutex lockdep annotation
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 2/2] new bd_mutex lockdep annotation
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
• Next by Date: Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/2] new bd_mutex lockdep annotation
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] new bd_mutex lockdep annotation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]