[PATCH 0/2] new bd_mutex lockdep annotation

--

Andrew thought the old bd_mutex lockdep annotations were too complex, 
Arjan too said something like this several weeks ago and suggested I do
something with lockdep_set_class() instead of mutex_lock_nested().

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • [PATCH 1/2] remove the old bd_mutex lockdep annotation
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 2/2] new bd_mutex lockdep annotation
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/2] new bd_mutex lockdep annotation
• Next by Date: [PATCH 1/2] remove the old bd_mutex lockdep annotation
• Previous by thread: Oops under 2.6.17 in tty_write?
• Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] new bd_mutex lockdep annotation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]