Re: Uses for memory barriers

Am Montag, 11. September 2006 18:21 schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> 1.      A given CPU will always perceive its own memory operations
>         as occuring in program order.

Is this true for physical memory if virtually indexed caches are
involved?

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Uses for memory barriers
  - From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Uses for memory barriers
  - From: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
- Re: Uses for memory barriers
  - From: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
- Re: Uses for memory barriers
  - From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
Next by Date: Re: [Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
Previous by thread: Re: Uses for memory barriers
Next by thread: Re: Uses for memory barriers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]