Re: Uses for memory barriers

Am Montag, 11. September 2006 18:21 schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> 1.      A given CPU will always perceive its own memory operations
>         as occuring in program order.

Is this true for physical memory if virtually indexed caches are
involved?

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Uses for memory barriers
    • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Uses for memory barriers
    • From: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
  • Re: Uses for memory barriers
    • From: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
  • Re: Uses for memory barriers
    • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
• Next by Date: Re: [Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
• Previous by thread: Re: Uses for memory barriers
• Next by thread: Re: Uses for memory barriers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]