Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> writes:
> On 09/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > On 09/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Updating this old code is painful.
>> >
>> > No, no, we shouldn't change the old code, it is fine.
>> >
>> So what happens when:
>> cpu0: cpu1:
>> kill_pid(vt_pid,....) fn_SAK()->vc_reset()->put_pid(xchg(&vt_pid, NULL))
>>
>> Can't kill_pid dereference vt_pid after put_pid is called?
>
> Ah, I didn't consider that patch as 'old code', sorry :)
What I meant was that updating code that predates SMP support is painful.
When you said everything was ok. I was confused.
> I don't understand drivers/char/vt*, but surely put_pid(xchg()) can't work.
> Again, unless we have a lock to serialize access to ->vt_pid, but in that
> case we don't need xchg().
Ok. So we are in violent agreement then, my patch was wrong.
The xchg half works. For taking and putting a reference it is fine, you
just can't use that reference for anything safely.
So I need to come up with a new patch that gets it's locking correct,
in the fn_SAK case.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]