Re: io-apic breaks suspend unless acpi_skip_timer_override

On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 10:58:03PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Do you mean suspend-to-RAM? Can you try beeping patch?

Yes, suspend to RAM. I'll look at trying to work out where it blows up, 
though I suspect it's successfully getting back into C code.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: io-apic breaks suspend unless acpi_skip_timer_override
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• References:
  • io-apic breaks suspend unless acpi_skip_timer_override
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
  • Re: io-apic breaks suspend unless acpi_skip_timer_override
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] force_quiescent_state: factor out duplicated code
• Next by Date: Re: Opinion on ordering of writel vs. stores to RAM
• Previous by thread: Re: io-apic breaks suspend unless acpi_skip_timer_override
• Next by thread: Re: io-apic breaks suspend unless acpi_skip_timer_override
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]