Re: Opinion on ordering of writel vs. stores to RAM

Ar Gwe, 2006-09-08 am 19:42 -0700, ysgrifennodd Linus Torvalds:
> It shouldn't. It's too expensive. 

Well it does because way back when you said it should 8)

__writel/__readl were the ones allowed to be un-ordered.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Opinion on ordering of writel vs. stores to RAM
  - From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: Opinion on ordering of writel vs. stores to RAM
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Bug] [2.6.18-rc5-mm1] system no boot early death x86_64
Next by Date: Re: Opinion on ordering of writel vs. stores to RAM
Previous by thread: Re: Opinion on ordering of writel vs. stores to RAM
Next by thread: Re: Opinion on ordering of writel vs. stores to RAM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]