> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:25 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> If we decide that "try HID first, then try CID" is the right thing,
>> I think we should figure out how to make that work. Maybe that
>> means extending the driver model somehow.
> Don't think it's easy, especially no other bus needs it I guess.
I agree it's probably not easy, but I think having the right
semantics is more important than fitting cleanly into the
driver model. But I know that without code, I'm just venting
hot air, not contributing to a solution.
How's the ACPI driver model integration going, anyway? I seem
to recall some patches a while back, but I don't think they're
in the tree yet.
> Do we really need the memory hotplug device returns pnp0c01/pnp0c02?
> What's the purpose?
I don't know. But I think Keith already determined that a BIOS change
is not likely. I hate to ask for BIOS changes like this because it
feels like asking them to avoid broken things in Linux.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
