Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers

On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 20:04:27 -0700
Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]> wrote:

> > I've been unable to reproduce this crash, btw.  Is there some magic
> > incantation apat from running `fsx-linux'?
> >   
> All I do is on a single 1k filesystem, run 4 copies of fsx (on 4 
> different files, ofcourse).
> I hit the assert anywhere between 10min-2hours.

hm, OK.

It could be that running

	while (1) {
		write(fd, "", 1);
		fsync(fd);
	}

will speed it up: cause a storm of commits, increase the probability.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Anton Altaparmakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
    • From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] ACPI_SONY shouldn't default m
• Next by Date: Re: [NEW PATCH] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]