On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 20:04:27 -0700 Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've been unable to reproduce this crash, btw. Is there some magic > > incantation apat from running `fsx-linux'? > > > All I do is on a single 1k filesystem, run 4 copies of fsx (on 4 > different files, ofcourse). > I hit the assert anywhere between 10min-2hours. hm, OK. It could be that running while (1) { write(fd, "", 1); fsync(fd); } will speed it up: cause a storm of commits, increase the probability. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Anton Altaparmakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- From: Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- Prev by Date: Re: [-mm patch] ACPI_SONY shouldn't default m
- Next by Date: Re: [NEW PATCH] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
- Index(es):