> code more maintainable (I hope/wish we could also do something similar with
> simplifying the locking as well).
I agree, and that is definitely on my medium-term todo list.
> Of course with this code, we have to await rigorous testing
> ... and more reviews, but please consider this as my ack for the approach.
Yeah, absolutely. Is there a chance that IBM can throw some testing
cycles at it? I have it queued up for some moderately sized DB runs
over here (FC arrays, cable pulling, that kind of thing.)
- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]