Hi! > > 2.4 and 2.6 are *very* different here. You'll probably need to optimize freezer > > in 2.6 a bit... > > > > Among other problems: e.g. 2.4 did not automatically do a VT switch; 2.6 > does; we'll have to have a way to signal "we're a sane display driver; > don't switch away from me on suspend". Not like that, please. You are using X running over framebuffer, right? So that kernel is controlling the graphics hardware. In such case it is safe to avoid VT switch. Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- From: Jim Gettys <[email protected]>
- Re: ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- From: "Jordan Crouse" <[email protected]>
- Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- References:
- RE: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
- Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- From: Jim Gettys <[email protected]>
- Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- From: Jim Gettys <[email protected]>
- RE: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip
- Next by Date: 2.6.17 odd hd slow down
- Previous by thread: Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- Next by thread: Re: ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
- Index(es):