On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:40:16AM -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
(Added [email protected] to the Cc:)
> While we are at cleaning up the code, I think it will be much better to
> move out C-state policy out of this acpi code altogether. We should have
That would be helpful. For the One Laptop Per Child project (or whatever
it's called today), it would be advantageous to run without acpi. At the
moment that would cost us deeper C states, so an interface to allow a
platform driver to register and provide the same functionality without
code duplication would be helpful.
--
Matthew Garrett | [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
