Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]

On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 00:57 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 12:06 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> 
> > > One way to fix this is to simply not hash the dentry when we're doing
> > > the O_EXCL intent optimisation, but rather to only hash it _after_ we've
> > > successfully created the file on the server. Something like the attached
> > > patch ought to do it.
> > 
> > No.
> > 
> > This patch simply marks the dentry negative and returns ENOMEM from the
> > lookup which, as would be expected, results in this error being returned
> > to userspace.
> 
> Oops. You are right. I forgot to set res=NULL...

Now returns EPERM.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: Ian Kent <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: Ian Kent <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: disable lock debugging when kernel state becomes untrusted
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: disable lock debugging when kernel state becomes untrusted
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]