Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> - Send fine-grained incremental patches.  It's OK to do complete
>   replacement patchsets when the code is new, but this stuff is supposed to
>   be stabilised.

I thought the code was still officially *new*.

As I understood things from what you said, you delegated responsibility for my
patches on to Trond, who hasn't taken them yet.  He has further delegated
review responsibility on to Christoph, so I've been consolidating my patches
to make it easier for Christoph (or whoever) to do so.

So, as I understand the situation, my patches won't go anywhere until
Christoph ACKs them and Trond takes them into his tree.  If this isn't so,
please clarify the situation.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] rate limiting for the ldisc open faulure messages
• Next by Date: [PATCH] rate limiting for socket allocation failure messages
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]