Re: [PATCH 03/16] GFS2: bmap and inode functions

* Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> >btw., it is in CodingStyle too:
> 
> It may be used in a lot of places, but there is no explicit written 
> rule. That's why there actually *IS* "if(" in the kernel too.

Not all obvious things are written into it, it's not a legal document. 
Currently only 1.2% of the toplevel */*.c files have the 'if(' 
construct. It's just a small style bug (it's not a big issue at all), i 
was only nitpicking. Lets move over to more important issues, ok? :-)

	Ingo

-- 
VGER BF report: H 0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 03/16] GFS2: bmap and inode functions
  - From: Steven Whitehouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 03/16] GFS2: bmap and inode functions
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 03/16] GFS2: bmap and inode functions
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 03/16] GFS2: bmap and inode functions
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 03/16] GFS2: bmap and inode functions
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 03/16] GFS2: bmap and inode functions
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 03/16] GFS2: bmap and inode functions
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] prevent timespec/timeval to ktime_t overflow
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 03/16] GFS2: bmap and inode functions
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 03/16] GFS2: bmap and inode functions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]