On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 13:59 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > No, quite the opposite. I'm arguing that the wrappers in mthca do > legitimately belong in a device driver, since they encapsulate > device-specific knowledge about what serialization suffices when an > atomic __raw_writeq() is not available. Yes, I figured that out from some later messages. I think we're violently in agreement, in that case. <b -- VGER BF report: H 0 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.18-rc5-mm1
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.18-rc5-mm1: drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.c compile error
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1: drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.c compile error
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1: drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.c compile error
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1: drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.c compile error
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1: drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.c compile error
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [openib-general] 2.6.18-rc5-mm1: drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.c compile error
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [openib-general] 2.6.18-rc5-mm1: drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.c compile error
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- 2.6.18-rc5-mm1
- Prev by Date: Re: [openib-general] 2.6.18-rc5-mm1: drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.c compile error
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1: drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.c compile error
- Previous by thread: Re: [openib-general] 2.6.18-rc5-mm1: drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2.c compile error
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1
- Index(es):
 |