Andrew> What's __raw_writeq() supposed to do, anyway? On alpha
Andrew> it's writeq() without an mb(). On parisc it's writeq()
Andrew> only the data is byte-reversed. On sparc64() it's
Andrew> incomprehensible. On everything else it's writeq().
My understanding is that __raw_writeq() is like writeq() except not
strongly ordered and without the byte-swap on big-endian
architectures. The __raw_writeX() variants are convenient to avoid
having to write inefficient code like writel(swab32(foo), ...) when
talking to a PCI device that wants big-endian data. Without the raw
variant, you end up with a double swap on big-endian architectures.
sparc64 looks wrong, since __raw_writeq() seems identical to writeq(),
which seems to imply it's going to swab what is stores.
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
