Chuck Lever wrote:
On 9/1/06, Olaf Kirch <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 11:31:25AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
I don't like this. The idea that multiple RPC services are listening
on the same port is a total hack. What other service might use this
besides NFSACL?
Why do you consider this a hack? I have always felt that librpc requiring
you to open separate ports for every program you register was a poor
design. The RPC header contains the program number, and the RPC code
is fully capable of demuxing incoming requests. So I do not think it is
a hack at all.
And yes, Solaris NFSACL resides on 2049 too.
I meant "Does Solaris advertise NFSACL on 2049 via the portmapper?"
Yes, the Solaris server registers the NFS_ACL service with the rpcbind
daemon. And, the NFS_ACL protocol is defined to use port 2049. Please
see nfs_acl.x (/usr/include/rpcsvc/nfs_acl.x) for details.
ps
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
