Re: [NFS] [PATCH 019 of 19] knfsd: Register all RPC programs with portmapper by default

On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 11:31 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:

> I don't like this.  The idea that multiple RPC services are listening
> on the same port is a total hack.  What other service might use this
> besides NFSACL?

Ermm... Any RPC server process that doesn't want to register with the
portmapper. The NFSv4 callback channel is one obvious candidate.

Cheers,
  Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 000 of 19] knfsd: lockd improvements
    • From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 019 of 19] knfsd: Register all RPC programs with portmapper by default
    • From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
  • Re: [NFS] [PATCH 019 of 19] knfsd: Register all RPC programs with portmapper by default
    • From: "Chuck Lever" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] set_page_buffer_dirty should skip unmapped buffers
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 3/9] Guest page hinting: volatile page cache.
• Previous by thread: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 019 of 19] knfsd: Register all RPC programs with portmapper by default
• Next by thread: [PATCH 012 of 19] knfsd: lockd: Add nlm_destroy_host
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]