Re: [patch 4/9] Guest page hinting: volatile swap cache.

On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 13:10 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PAGE_STATES)

This is a bit odd.  Why not use an #ifdef like the rest of the kernel?
 
-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 4/9] Guest page hinting: volatile swap cache.
  - From: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch 4/9] Guest page hinting: volatile swap cache.
  - From: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 3/9] Guest page hinting: volatile page cache.
Next by Date: Re: [patch 4/9] Guest page hinting: volatile swap cache.
Previous by thread: [patch 4/9] Guest page hinting: volatile swap cache.
Next by thread: Re: [patch 4/9] Guest page hinting: volatile swap cache.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]