On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 12:49:27PM +0100, Just Marc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sure many of you have experience with lots of different of spam
> filters, at least some of you will know how good and effective DSPAM is.
>
> What I propose is simple, after we teach DSPAM what is ham and what is
> spam (a quick process on LKML) have one person who will volunteer
> to weed out any false positives (if any) for a short period of time,
> following that we can just let DSPAM do its magic and enjoy a totally
> spam free
> LKML.
>
> The chance of false positives with the kind of highly specific topics
> and keywords discussed on LKML is extremely small.
>
> Comments?
If you think linux-kernel didn't have any spam filtering you should read
the information linked from the text that is attached to _every_ email
sent to linux-kernel.
The last spamfilter discussion on this list was less than one month ago.
Please read the list archives before restarting the same old discussion.
> Marc
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
