On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 12:25:02PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I still think this will need some better filters to be useful. At least
> a optional uid filter perhaps (make sure to handle the interrupt case
> correctly, interrupts don't belong to the uid) , and perhaps an option to only
> fail GFP_ATOMIC.
I wrote process filter. Please patch 6/6. But I forgot to ignore
in_interrupt() case.
> With arbitary failing the system will just be unusable, right? Or would
> you run some system you use this way? @)
>
> Another possibility would be to look up __builtin_return_address(0) in
> the module table and allow failing only for a specific module.
That will be useful. Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
