Re: [patch 1/6] fault-injection capabilities infrastructure

On Thursday 31 August 2006 12:07, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>
> Index: work-shouldfail/lib/should_fail.c
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null
> +++ work-shouldfail/lib/should_fail.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@

You really need some more comments in this file, describing
what it does in a high level way. Or ideally something
in Documentation/* describing what the various modules
do and how to use them? 


-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 0/6] RFC: fault-injection capabilities (v2)
    • From: Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
  • [patch 1/6] fault-injection capabilities infrastructure
    • From: Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: hotunplug cpus and mems in all cpusets
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 3/6] fault-injection capability for alloc_pages()
• Previous by thread: [patch 1/6] fault-injection capabilities infrastructure
• Next by thread: [patch 6/6] process filtering for fault-injection capabilities
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]