Eric W. Biederman wrote:
[ ... ]
>>> That plus the obvious bit. For the pid namespace we have to declare
>>> war on people storing a pid_t values. Either converting them to
>>> struct pid * or removing them entirely. Doing the kernel_thread to
>>> kthread conversion removes them entirely.
>> we've started that war, won a few battles but some drivers need more work
>> that a simple replace. If we could give some priorities, it would help to
>> focus on the most important ones. check out the list bellow.
>
> Sure, I think I can help.
>
> There are a couple of test I can think of that should help.
> 1) Is the pid value stored. If not a pid namespace won't affect
> it's normal operation.
I've extracted this list from a table which includes a pid cache column.
this pid cache column is not complete yet. I'd be nice if we could use a
wiki to maintain this table, the existing openvz or vserver wiki ?
> 2) Is this thread started during kernel boot before this thread
> could have a user space parent. If it can't have a user space
> parent then it can't take a reference to user space resources.
ok we need to add this one.
> 3) Can the code be compiled modular and will it break when we stop
> exporting kernel_thread.
got that also.
> 4) How frequently is this thing used. The more common code is probably
> in better shape and more likely to get a good maintainer response, and
> we care more :)
sure :) some drivers are for some exotic piece of hardware that are not
currently found on a standard server.
> irqbalanced from arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c should be safe to leave alone
> because it doesn't store a pid_t, it is started during boot, and it can't
> be compiled modular.
>
>>From what I have seen you can shorten the list by several entries by removing
> code like irqbalanced that can't possibly cause us any problems.
> kvoyagerd from arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_thread.c is another one.
ok thanks, will update.
> The first on my personal hit list is nfs.
>> fs/lockd/clntlock.c
>> fs/nfs/delegation.c
>> net/sunrpc/svc.c
>
> Because it does store pid_t values, it isn't started during kernel boot,
> it can be compiled modular, and people use it all of the time.
yes yes. hard stuff though which requires time.
> I do agree from what I have seen, that changing idioms to the kthread way of
> doing things isn't simply a matter of substitute and replace which is
> unfortunate. Although the biggest hurdle seems to be to teach kernel threads
> to communicate with something besides signals. Which is a general help anyway.
>
> Unfortunately I'm distracted at the moment so I haven't gone through the entire
> list but I hope this helps.
we would need a wiki to maintain the work in progress on that topic while
we work on the pidspace.
another list to maintain would be the pid_t to struct pid replacement.
C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]