On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:56:36PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Can anybody explain me how can we use REGPARM if we have to link with host
> glibc?
Umm, yeah, good point. This regparam behavior is different from the old
behavior, where regparam functions had to be declared as such.
However, this is a potential problem with all regparam users, who all
presumably use libc, so I'd imagine it works somehow.
> If we are going to use klibc instead of glibc that's ok (and this is not the
> case I'm talking about), but I do not know that plan (and nobody discussed
> the implications).
I've been idly considering that, but it's no more than idle consideration
right now.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
