Dave Kleikamp wrote:
On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 19:37 +0200, Richard Knutsson wrote:
From: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>
Conversion of booleans to: generic-boolean.patch (2006-08-23)
Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>
---
Compile-tested
inode.c | 2 +-
jfs_dmap.c | 12 ++++++------
jfs_extent.c | 14 +++++++-------
jfs_extent.h | 4 ++--
jfs_imap.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
jfs_imap.h | 4 ++--
jfs_metapage.h | 4 ++--
jfs_txnmgr.c | 16 ++++++++--------
jfs_types.h | 4 ----
jfs_xtree.c | 2 +-
xattr.c | 10 +++++-----
11 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
original patch removed <<<
Richard,
Here's a version of the patch with completely removes any boolean types
and constants:
JFS: Conversion of boolean to int
<patch removed>
Just why is it, that when there is a change to make locally defined
booleans into a more generic one, it is converted into integers? ;)
But seriously, what is gained by removing them, other then less
understandable code? (Not talking about FALSE -> 0, but boolean_t -> int)
I can understand if authors disprove making an integer into a boolean,
but here it already were booleans.
But hey, you are the maintainer ;)
Richard Knutsson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
