On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 12:00:37PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Matt Domsch wrote: > > > >No reason. I was just trying to be careful, not leaving data in the > >upper bits of those registers going uninitialized. If we know they're > >not being used ever, then it's not a problem. But I don't think > >that's the source of the command line size concern, is it? > > > > No, it's treating the command line as a fixed buffer, as opposed to a > null-terminated string. This was always a bug, by the way. OK, I'll look at fixing that, and using %esi throughout. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: Matt Domsch <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- Prev by Date: Re: Serial custom speed deprecated?
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] RFKILL - Add support for input key to control wireless radio
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- Index(es):