On 8/28/06, H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> wrote:
Totally pointless since we're in 16-bit mode (as is the "incl %esi")... I guess it's "better" in the sense that if we run out of that we'll crash due to a segment overrun... maybe (some BIOSes leave us unknowningly in big real mode...)
So leave as is? Loading address into esi and reference as si? Or modify the whole code to use 16 bits? Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- Prev by Date: Re: Serial custom speed deprecated?
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7] CPU controller V1 - split runqueue
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping)
- Index(es):