Re: [PATCH] maximum latency tracking infrastructure (version 3)

Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> I could have sworn there was an idle call notifier already\
> 
> ah there is on x86-64 but it is architecture specific...

The original implementation was on s390. But they're not really
designed for doing anything slow, so I wouldn't recommend using
them in drivers unless it's very fast.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] maximum latency tracking infrastructure (version 3)
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] maximum latency tracking infrastructure (version 3)
    • From: Andreas Mohr <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] maximum latency tracking infrastructure (version 3)
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: e1000 driver contains private copy of GPL... and modified one, too
• Next by Date: RE: [CFT:PATCH] Removing possible wrong asm/serial.h inclusions
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] maximum latency tracking infrastructure (version 3)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] maximum latency tracking infrastructure (version 3)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]