Hi!
> >Okay, so modifications are not major: different address of free
> >software foundation, completely different formatting, some characters
> >added, and some characters removed. It no longer contains Linus'
> >clarifications.
> >
> >--- LICENSE 2006-07-21 05:42:27.000000000 +0200
> >+++ ../../../COPYING 2006-07-21 05:42:27.000000000 +0200
> >@@ -1,128 +1,141 @@
> >Now... I believe nothing evil is going on, but having two slightly
> >different copies of GPL in one source seems wrong, can we get rid of
> >e1000 one?
>
> I'll ask around here and see if this doesn't make people cringe. Meanwhile
> Pavel should examine sound/oss/COPYING and arch/sparc/lib/COPYING.LIB too :)
Hehe, okay, going after them.
sparc64 lib: this is actually LGPL, but I'm not sure what it applies
to. If specific files are under LGPL, I guess they should say that in
headers... Plus, not *all* files seems like LGPLed to me:
atomic32.c: * Based on asm-parisc/atomic.h Copyright (C) 2000 Philipp Rumpf
...I do not think atomic.h from parisc was LGPL. Dave?
oss/COPYING... I guess we can just remove that one. I do not think we
have maintainer for OSS. Should I submit deleting patch for Andrew, or
Andrew, can you just rm sound/oss/COPYING?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
