On Monday 28 August 2006 03:22, David Rees wrote:
>On 8/27/06, Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
>> However, the lack of a freely downloadable version with no
>> support certainly seems to be a GPL violation to me. It should be
>> checked out IMO.
>
>Gene, this is not quite the right list for this discussion (have a
>look at http://gpl-violations.org/) and your understanding of the GPL
>is incorrect.
>
>Just because a company doesn't have source freely downloadable on
>their website does not mean they are violating the GPL even if they
>are selling GPL licensed software. Only people who buy the GPL
>licensed software are entitled to a copy of the source of the binaries
>they receive.
I came to that same conclusion after reading their FAQ later. Sorry for
the noise. My interest is in whether or not the RTAI stuff will be
similarly hidden from public use as I DO use that while running my milling
machine with EMC2. That interest was my trigger to at least ask the
question.
>-Dave
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
