Re: [PATCH 1/7] CPU controller V1 - split runqueue

Srivatsa,

I suggest to split existing runqueue structure
into 2 pieces: physical cpu (sd, ...) and
virtual cpu (essentially a runqueue - array, nr_running, loac etc.)

Then replace all references to cpu as int with vcpu_t pointer.

What advantages does it give?
1. it isolates Linux std scheduler code for scheduling
  tasks inside runqueues, while adds possibility
  to add cleanly more high-level scheduler, which can select
  runqueues to run (lets call it "process groups scheduler" - PGS).
2. runqueues can run on arbitrary physical CPUs if needed
  which helps to solve balancing problem on SMP.
3. it allows naturally to use different PGS algorithms
  on top of Linux one. e.g. yours algorithm (probobalistic) or

fair scheduling algorithms like SFQ, EEVDF, BVT with morepredictable parameters of QoS.

4. it will help us to get to the consensus and commit this work
  into mainstream, because different PGS with different properties
  will be possible.

Part of this idea is implemented in OpenVZ scheduler and in some
regards looks very much like your work, so I think if you like the idea
we can eloborate.

What do you think?

Thanks,
Kirill

This patch splits the single main runqueue into several runqueues on each CPU.
One (main) runqueue is used to hold task-groups and one runqueue for each
task-group in the system.

Signed-off-by : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>



 init/Kconfig   |    8 +
 kernel/sched.c |  254 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 231 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/sched.c~base_cpu_ctlr kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.6.18-rc3/kernel/sched.c~base_cpu_ctlr	2006-08-19 21:58:54.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-root/kernel/sched.c	2006-08-20 21:44:30.000000000 +0530
@@ -191,11 +191,51 @@ static inline unsigned int task_timeslic

struct prio_array {

 	unsigned int nr_active;
+	int best_static_prio, best_dyn_prio;
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, MAX_PRIO+1); /* include 1 bit for delimiter */
 	struct list_head queue[MAX_PRIO];
 };

/*

+ * Each task belong to some task-group. Task-groups and what tasks they contain
+ * are defined by the administrator using some suitable interface.
+ * Administrator can also define the CPU bandwidth provided to each task-group.
+ *
+ * Task-groups are given a certain priority to run on every CPU. Currently
+ * task-group priority on a CPU is defined to be the same as that of
+ * highest-priority runnable task it has on that CPU. Task-groups also
+ * get their own runqueue on every CPU. The main runqueue on each CPU is
+ * used to hold task-groups, rather than tasks.
+ *
+ * Scheduling decision on a CPU is now two-step : first pick highest priority
+ * task-group from the main runqueue and next pick highest priority task from
+ * the runqueue of that group. Both decisions are of O(1) complexity.
+ */
+
+/* runqueue used for every task-group */
+struct task_grp_rq {
+	struct prio_array arrays[2];
+	struct prio_array *active, *expired, *rq_array;
+	unsigned long expired_timestamp;
+	unsigned int ticks;		/* Decremented every tick */
+	int prio;			/* Priority of the task-group */
+	struct list_head list;
+	struct task_grp *tg;
+};
+
+/* xxx: Avoid this for !CONFIG_CPU_METER */
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_grp_rq, init_tg_rq);
+
+/* task-group object - maintains information about each task-group */
+struct task_grp {
+	int ticks;			 /* bandwidth given to the task-group */
+	struct task_grp_rq *rq[NR_CPUS]; /* runqueue pointer for every cpu */
+};
+
+/* The "default" task-group */
+struct task_grp init_task_grp;
+
+/*
  * This is the main, per-CPU runqueue data structure.
  *
  * Locking rule: those places that want to lock multiple runqueues
@@ -224,12 +264,11 @@ struct rq {
 	 */
 	unsigned long nr_uninterruptible;

- unsigned long expired_timestamp;

 	unsigned long long timestamp_last_tick;
 	struct task_struct *curr, *idle;
 	struct mm_struct *prev_mm;
+	/* these arrays hold task-groups */
 	struct prio_array *active, *expired, arrays[2];
-	int best_expired_prio;
 	atomic_t nr_iowait;

#ifdef CONFIG_SMP

@@ -244,6 +283,7 @@ struct rq {
 #endif

#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS

+	/* xxx: move these to task-group runqueue */
 	/* latency stats */
 	struct sched_info rq_sched_info;

@@ -657,6 +697,63 @@ sched_info_switch(struct task_struct *pr

 #define sched_info_switch(t, next)	do { } while (0)
 #endif /* CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS || CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT */

+static unsigned int task_grp_timeslice(struct task_grp *tg)

+{
+	/* xxx: take into account sleep_avg etc of the group */
+	return tg->ticks;
+}
+
+/* Dequeue task-group object from the main per-cpu runqueue */
+static void dequeue_task_grp(struct task_grp_rq *tgrq)
+{
+	struct prio_array *array = tgrq->rq_array;
+
+	array->nr_active--;
+	list_del(&tgrq->list);
+	if (list_empty(array->queue + tgrq->prio))
+		__clear_bit(tgrq->prio, array->bitmap);
+	tgrq->rq_array = NULL;
+}
+
+/* Enqueue task-group object on the main per-cpu runqueue */
+static void enqueue_task_grp(struct task_grp_rq *tgrq, struct prio_array *array,
+				int head)
+{
+	if (!head)
+		list_add_tail(&tgrq->list, array->queue + tgrq->prio);
+	else
+        	list_add(&tgrq->list, array->queue + tgrq->prio);
+        __set_bit(tgrq->prio, array->bitmap);
+        array->nr_active++;
+        tgrq->rq_array = array;
+}
+
+/* return the task-group to which a task belongs */
+static inline struct task_grp *task_grp(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return &init_task_grp;
+}
+
+static inline void update_task_grp_prio(struct task_grp_rq *tgrq, struct rq *rq,
+								 int head)
+{
+	int new_prio;
+	struct prio_array *array = tgrq->rq_array;
+
+	new_prio = tgrq->active->best_dyn_prio;
+	if (new_prio == MAX_PRIO)
+		new_prio = tgrq->expired->best_dyn_prio;
+
+	if (array)
+		dequeue_task_grp(tgrq);
+	tgrq->prio = new_prio;
+	if (new_prio != MAX_PRIO) {
+		if (!array)
+			array = rq->active;
+		enqueue_task_grp(tgrq, array, head);
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Adding/removing a task to/from a priority array:
  */
@@ -664,8 +761,17 @@ static void dequeue_task(struct task_str
 {
 	array->nr_active--;
 	list_del(&p->run_list);
-	if (list_empty(array->queue + p->prio))
+	if (list_empty(array->queue + p->prio)) {
 		__clear_bit(p->prio, array->bitmap);
+		if (p->prio == array->best_dyn_prio) {
+			struct task_grp_rq *tgrq = task_grp(p)->rq[task_cpu(p)];
+
+			array->best_dyn_prio =
+					sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
+			if (array == tgrq->active || !tgrq->active->nr_active)
+				update_task_grp_prio(tgrq, task_rq(p), 0);
+		}
+	}
 }

static void enqueue_task(struct task_struct *p, struct prio_array *array)

@@ -675,6 +781,14 @@ static void enqueue_task(struct task_str
 	__set_bit(p->prio, array->bitmap);
 	array->nr_active++;
 	p->array = array;
+
+	if (p->prio < array->best_dyn_prio) {
+		struct task_grp_rq *tgrq = task_grp(p)->rq[task_cpu(p)];
+
+		array->best_dyn_prio = p->prio;
+		if (array == tgrq->active || !tgrq->active->nr_active)
+			update_task_grp_prio(tgrq, task_rq(p), 0);
+	}
 }

/*

@@ -693,6 +807,14 @@ enqueue_task_head(struct task_struct *p,
 	__set_bit(p->prio, array->bitmap);
 	array->nr_active++;
 	p->array = array;
+
+	if (p->prio < array->best_dyn_prio) {
+		struct task_grp_rq *tgrq = task_grp(p)->rq[task_cpu(p)];
+
+		array->best_dyn_prio = p->prio;
+		if (array == tgrq->active || !tgrq->active->nr_active)
+			update_task_grp_prio(tgrq, task_rq(p), 1);
+	}
 }

/*

@@ -831,10 +953,11 @@ static int effective_prio(struct task_st
  */
 static void __activate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
 {
-	struct prio_array *target = rq->active;
+	struct task_grp_rq *tgrq = task_grp(p)->rq[task_cpu(p)];
+	struct prio_array *target = tgrq->active;

if (batch_task(p))

-		target = rq->expired;
+		target = tgrq->expired;
 	enqueue_task(p, target);
 	inc_nr_running(p, rq);
 }
@@ -844,7 +967,10 @@ static void __activate_task(struct task_
  */
 static inline void __activate_idle_task(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
 {
-	enqueue_task_head(p, rq->active);
+	struct task_grp_rq *tgrq = task_grp(p)->rq[task_cpu(p)];
+	struct prio_array *target = tgrq->active;
+
+	enqueue_task_head(p, target);
 	inc_nr_running(p, rq);
 }

@@ -2077,7 +2203,7 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_structreturn 1;

-#define rq_best_prio(rq) min((rq)->curr->prio, (rq)->best_expired_prio)

+#define rq_best_prio(rq) min((rq)->curr->prio, (rq)->expired->best_static_prio)

/*

  * move_tasks tries to move up to max_nr_move tasks and max_load_move weighted
@@ -2884,6 +3010,8 @@ unsigned long long current_sched_time(co
 	return ns;
 }

+#define nr_tasks(tgrq) (tgrq->active->nr_active + tgrq->expired->nr_active)

+
 /*
  * We place interactive tasks back into the active array, if possible.
  *
@@ -2894,13 +3022,13 @@ unsigned long long current_sched_time(co
  * increasing number of running tasks. We also ignore the interactivity
  * if a better static_prio task has expired:
  */
-static inline int expired_starving(struct rq *rq)
+static inline int expired_starving(struct task_grp_rq *rq)
 {
-	if (rq->curr->static_prio > rq->best_expired_prio)
+	if (current->static_prio > rq->expired->best_static_prio)
 		return 1;
 	if (!STARVATION_LIMIT || !rq->expired_timestamp)
 		return 0;
-	if (jiffies - rq->expired_timestamp > STARVATION_LIMIT * rq->nr_running)
+	if (jiffies - rq->expired_timestamp > STARVATION_LIMIT * nr_tasks(rq))
 		return 1;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -2991,6 +3119,7 @@ void scheduler_tick(void)
 	struct task_struct *p = current;
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+	struct task_grp_rq *tgrq = task_grp(p)->rq[cpu];

update_cpu_clock(p, rq, now);@@ -3004,7 +3133,7 @@ void scheduler_tick(void)

/* Task might have expired already, but not scheduled off yet */

-	if (p->array != rq->active) {
+	if (p->array != tgrq->active) {
 		set_tsk_need_resched(p);
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -3027,25 +3156,26 @@ void scheduler_tick(void)
 			set_tsk_need_resched(p);

/* put it at the end of the queue: */

-			requeue_task(p, rq->active);
+			requeue_task(p, tgrq->active);
 		}
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 	if (!--p->time_slice) {
-		dequeue_task(p, rq->active);
+		dequeue_task(p, tgrq->active);
 		set_tsk_need_resched(p);
 		p->prio = effective_prio(p);
 		p->time_slice = task_timeslice(p);
 		p->first_time_slice = 0;

- if (!rq->expired_timestamp)

-			rq->expired_timestamp = jiffies;
-		if (!TASK_INTERACTIVE(p) || expired_starving(rq)) {
-			enqueue_task(p, rq->expired);
-			if (p->static_prio < rq->best_expired_prio)
-				rq->best_expired_prio = p->static_prio;
+		if (!tgrq->expired_timestamp)
+			tgrq->expired_timestamp = jiffies;
+		if (!TASK_INTERACTIVE(p) || expired_starving(tgrq)) {
+			enqueue_task(p, tgrq->expired);
+			if (p->static_prio < tgrq->expired->best_static_prio)
+				tgrq->expired->best_static_prio =
+							 p->static_prio;
 		} else
-			enqueue_task(p, rq->active);
+			enqueue_task(p, tgrq->active);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * Prevent a too long timeslice allowing a task to monopolize
@@ -3066,12 +3196,21 @@ void scheduler_tick(void)
 		if (TASK_INTERACTIVE(p) && !((task_timeslice(p) -
 			p->time_slice) % TIMESLICE_GRANULARITY(p)) &&
 			(p->time_slice >= TIMESLICE_GRANULARITY(p)) &&
-			(p->array == rq->active)) {
+			(p->array == tgrq->active)) {

- requeue_task(p, rq->active);

+			requeue_task(p, tgrq->active);
 			set_tsk_need_resched(p);
 		}
 	}
+
+	if (!--tgrq->ticks) {
+		/* Move the task group to expired list */
+		dequeue_task_grp(tgrq);
+		tgrq->ticks = task_grp_timeslice(task_grp(p));
+		enqueue_task_grp(tgrq, rq->expired, 0);
+		set_tsk_need_resched(p);
+	}
+
 out_unlock:
 	spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
 out:
@@ -3264,6 +3403,7 @@ asmlinkage void __sched schedule(void)
 	int cpu, idx, new_prio;
 	long *switch_count;
 	struct rq *rq;
+	struct task_grp_rq *next_grp;

/*

 	 * Test if we are atomic.  Since do_exit() needs to call into
@@ -3332,23 +3472,41 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
 		idle_balance(cpu, rq);
 		if (!rq->nr_running) {
 			next = rq->idle;
-			rq->expired_timestamp = 0;
 			wake_sleeping_dependent(cpu);
 			goto switch_tasks;
 		}
 	}

+ /* Pick a task group first */

+#ifdef CONFIG_CPUMETER
 	array = rq->active;
 	if (unlikely(!array->nr_active)) {
 		/*
 		 * Switch the active and expired arrays.
 		 */
-		schedstat_inc(rq, sched_switch);
 		rq->active = rq->expired;
 		rq->expired = array;
 		array = rq->active;
-		rq->expired_timestamp = 0;
-		rq->best_expired_prio = MAX_PRIO;
+	}
+	idx = sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
+	queue = array->queue + idx;
+	next_grp = list_entry(queue->next, struct task_grp_rq, list);
+#else
+	next_grp = init_task_grp.rq[cpu];
+#endif
+
+	/* Pick a task within that group next */
+	array = next_grp->active;
+	if (!array->nr_active) {
+		/*
+		 * Switch the active and expired arrays.
+		 */
+		schedstat_inc(next_grp, sched_switch);
+		next_grp->active = next_grp->expired;
+		next_grp->expired = array;
+		array = next_grp->active;
+		next_grp->expired_timestamp = 0;
+		next_grp->expired->best_static_prio = MAX_PRIO;
 	}

idx = sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);

@@ -4413,7 +4571,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_sched_getaffinity(pi
 asmlinkage long sys_sched_yield(void)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = this_rq_lock();
-	struct prio_array *array = current->array, *target = rq->expired;
+	struct task_grp_rq *tgrq = task_grp(current)->rq[task_cpu(current)];
+	struct prio_array *array = current->array, *target = tgrq->expired;

schedstat_inc(rq, yld_cnt);

 	/*
@@ -4424,13 +4583,13 @@ asmlinkage long sys_sched_yield(void)
 	 *  array.)
 	 */
 	if (rt_task(current))
-		target = rq->active;
+		target = tgrq->active;

if (array->nr_active == 1) {

 		schedstat_inc(rq, yld_act_empty);
-		if (!rq->expired->nr_active)
+		if (!tgrq->expired->nr_active)
 			schedstat_inc(rq, yld_both_empty);
-	} else if (!rq->expired->nr_active)
+	} else if (!tgrq->expired->nr_active)
 		schedstat_inc(rq, yld_exp_empty);

if (array != target) {

@@ -6722,21 +6881,54 @@ int in_sched_functions(unsigned long add
 		&& addr < (unsigned long)__sched_text_end);
 }

+static void task_grp_rq_init(struct task_grp_rq *tgrq, struct task_grp *tg)

+{
+	int j, k;
+
+	tgrq->active = tgrq->arrays;
+	tgrq->expired = tgrq->arrays + 1;
+	tgrq->rq_array = NULL;
+	tgrq->expired->best_static_prio = MAX_PRIO;
+	tgrq->expired->best_dyn_prio = MAX_PRIO;
+	tgrq->active->best_static_prio = MAX_PRIO;
+	tgrq->active->best_dyn_prio = MAX_PRIO;
+	tgrq->prio = MAX_PRIO;
+	tgrq->ticks = tg->ticks;
+	tgrq->tg = tg;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tgrq->list);
+
+	for (j = 0; j < 2; j++) {
+		struct prio_array *array;
+
+		array = tgrq->arrays + j;
+		for (k = 0; k < MAX_PRIO; k++) {
+			INIT_LIST_HEAD(array->queue + k);
+			__clear_bit(k, array->bitmap);
+		}
+		// delimiter for bitsearch
+		__set_bit(MAX_PRIO, array->bitmap);
+	}
+}
+
 void __init sched_init(void)
 {
 	int i, j, k;

+ init_task_grp.ticks = -1; /* Unlimited bandwidth */

+
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
 		struct prio_array *array;
 		struct rq *rq;
+		struct task_grp_rq *tgrq;

rq = cpu_rq(i);

+		tgrq = init_task_grp.rq[i] = &per_cpu(init_tg_rq, i);
 		spin_lock_init(&rq->lock);
+		task_grp_rq_init(tgrq, &init_task_grp);
 		lockdep_set_class(&rq->lock, &rq->rq_lock_key);
 		rq->nr_running = 0;
 		rq->active = rq->arrays;
 		rq->expired = rq->arrays + 1;
-		rq->best_expired_prio = MAX_PRIO;

#ifdef CONFIG_SMP

 		rq->sd = NULL;
diff -puN init/Kconfig~base_cpu_ctlr init/Kconfig
--- linux-2.6.18-rc3/init/Kconfig~base_cpu_ctlr	2006-08-19 21:58:54.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-root/init/Kconfig	2006-08-19 21:58:54.000000000 +0530
@@ -248,6 +248,14 @@ config CPUSETS

Say N if unsure.+config CPUMETER

+	bool "CPU resource control"
+	depends on CPUSETS
+	help
+	  This options lets you create cpu resource partitions within
+	  cpusets. Each resource partition can be given a different quota
+	  of CPU usage.
+
 config RELAY
 	bool "Kernel->user space relay support (formerly relayfs)"
 	help

_


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/7] CPU controller V1 - split runqueue
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/7] CPU controller - V1
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/7] CPU controller V1 - split runqueue
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 10/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch support
Next by Date: FYI: 2.6.16-smp: DMA memory inbalance for NUMA?
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/7] CPU controller V1 - split runqueue
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/7] CPU controller V1 - split runqueue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]