On Friday 25 August 2006 13:56, Stephane Eranian wrote: > > I suppose some of those functions must be marked __kprobes > > > Are there any guidelines as to why some functions must be ignored > by kprobes? I assume if meaans they cannot be instrumented. It does yes. In general anything that could cause kprobes to recurse is forbidden. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 10/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch support
- From: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 10/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch support
- References:
- [PATCH 10/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch support
- From: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 10/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch support
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 10/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch support
- From: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 10/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch support
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7] CPU controller V1 - split runqueue
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 10/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch support
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 10/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch support
- Index(es):
 |