Re: [PATCH 11/17] BLOCK: Move common FS-specific ioctls to linux/fs.h [try #2]

On Friday 25 August 2006 10:38, David Howells wrote:
> 
> Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >       case FS_IOC_GETFLAGS32:
> >       case FS_IOC_GETFLAGS64:
> 
> That'll get you a "duplicate case statement" warning on a 32-bit arch.
> 

No, I defined them with u32 and u64 arguments, respectively, so the
numbers are distinct on 32 bit.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 11/17] BLOCK: Move common FS-specific ioctls to linux/fs.h [try #2]
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 11/17] BLOCK: Move common FS-specific ioctls to linux/fs.h [try #2]
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 11/17] BLOCK: Move common FS-specific ioctls to linux/fs.h [try #2]
Next by Date: Re: Strange write starvation on 2.6.17 (and other) kernels
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 11/17] BLOCK: Move common FS-specific ioctls to linux/fs.h [try #2]
Next by thread: [PATCH 12/17] BLOCK: Move the ReiserFS device ioctl compat stuff to the ReiserFS driver [try #2]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]