Re: [PATCH 11/17] BLOCK: Move common FS-specific ioctls to linux/fs.h [try #2]

On Friday 25 August 2006 10:38, David Howells wrote:
> 
> Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >       case FS_IOC_GETFLAGS32:
> >       case FS_IOC_GETFLAGS64:
> 
> That'll get you a "duplicate case statement" warning on a 32-bit arch.
> 

No, I defined them with u32 and u64 arguments, respectively, so the
numbers are distinct on 32 bit.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 11/17] BLOCK: Move common FS-specific ioctls to linux/fs.h [try #2]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 11/17] BLOCK: Move common FS-specific ioctls to linux/fs.h [try #2]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 11/17] BLOCK: Move common FS-specific ioctls to linux/fs.h [try #2]
• Next by Date: Re: Strange write starvation on 2.6.17 (and other) kernels
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 11/17] BLOCK: Move common FS-specific ioctls to linux/fs.h [try #2]
• Next by thread: [PATCH 12/17] BLOCK: Move the ReiserFS device ioctl compat stuff to the ReiserFS driver [try #2]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]