Re: [PATCH 5/6] BC: kernel memory accounting (core)

On 08/23, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>
> +int bc_slab_charge(kmem_cache_t *cachep, void *objp, gfp_t flags)
> +{
> +	unsigned int size;
> +	struct beancounter *bc, **slab_bcp;
> +
> +	bc = get_exec_bc();
> +	if (bc == NULL)
> +		return 0;

Is it possible to .exec_bc == NULL ?

If yes, why do we need init_bc? We can do 'set_exec_bc(NULL)' in __do_IRQ()
instead.

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 5/6] BC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v2)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 5/6] BC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Scsi errors with Megaraid 300-8x
• Next by Date: Re: Areca arcmsr kernel integration for 2.6.18?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/6] BC: kernel memory accounting (core)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/6] BC: kernel memory accounting (core)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]