Re: [PATCH 5/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet bottom half

On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:03:04AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> using the NAPI poll function

Still fiddling with this. Getting side-tracked after noticing
that the RX side generates a *huge* numbe of interrupts, despite
code in the driver which superficially appears to be RX NAPI.  
One step forward, two steps back, isn't there a dance like that?

--linas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet ethernet driver update
    • From: [email protected] (Linas Vepstas)
  • [PATCH 5/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet bottom half
    • From: [email protected] (Linas Vepstas)
  • Re: [PATCH 5/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet bottom half
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Serial custom speed deprecated?
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet low watermark patch.
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] HOWTO use NAPI to reduce TX interrupts
• Next by thread: [PATCH 6/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet refine locking
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]