Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.

Not to mention the name used causes (at least me) some confusion with
BSD's kqueue implementation. Skimming over the patches it actually
looks somewhat like kqueue with the more interesting features removed,
like the ability to pass the filter changes simultaneously with
polling.

Maybe this is a topic that will singe my fur, but what is wrong with
the kqueue API? Will I really have to implement support for yet
another event API in my program.

Rakshasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
    • From: Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
    • From: Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [take12 3/3] kevent: Timer notifications.
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] paravirt.h
• Previous by thread: Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
• Next by thread: Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]