Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)

Rohit Seth wrote:

[snip]
>>>> inodes can belong to multiple containers and so do the pages.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm still thinking that inodes should belong to one container (or may be
>>> have it configurable based on some flag).
>> this is not true for OpenVZ nor Linux-VServer.
>
>
> Well, it is still useful.  Just like an anonymous page get charged to
> container where the object (task) belong to, file page seems appropriate
> to belong to container where the object (inode) belongs to.
>
> -rohit
Making inodes belong to one container only significantly shrinks
container density. Sharing of glibc only saves up to 4Mb per container.
For the case of 100 containers it is 400Mb of booth - the disk space
and (what is more important) - RAM.

Pavel.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Strange write starvation on 2.6.17 (and other) kernels
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] xfs: i_state of inode is changed after the inode is freed
• Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
• Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]