On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 10:16 -0700, Rohit Seth wrote: > > That said, it sure is simpler to implement, so I'm all for it! > > hmm, not sure why it is simpler. When you ask the question, "which container owns this page?", you don't have to look far, nor is it ambiguous in any way. It is very strict, and very straightforward. -- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
- From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
- From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] sched: group CPU power setup cleanup
- Next by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
- Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
- Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core)
- Index(es):
 |