On 8/21/06, Mel Gorman <[email protected]> wrote:
This is V9 of the patchset to size zones and memory holes in an
architecture-independent manner. It booted successfully on 5 different
machines (arches were x86, x86_64, ppc64 and ia64) in a number of different
configurations and successfully built a kernel. If it fails on any machine,
booting with loglevel=8 and the console log should tell me what went wrong.
I am wondering why this new api didn't cleanup the pfn_to_nid code
path as well. Arches are left to still keep another set of
nid-start-end info around. We are sending info like
add_active_range(unsigned int nid, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned
long end_pfn)
With this info making a common pnf_to_nid seems to be of intrest so we
don't have to keep redundant information in both generic and arch
specific data structures.
Are you intending the hot-add memory code path to call add_active_range or ???
Thanks,
Keith
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
