On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 17:01 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
[ #define vs enum { } ]
> And, ugh:
>
> (gdb) list
> 1 enum {
> 2 A = 1,
> 3 B = 2,
> 4 };
> 5
> 6 int main()
> 7 {
> 8 printf("%x\n", A | B);
> 9 }
> (gdb) bre 8
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x4004ac: file ./test.c, line 8.
> (gdb) r
> Starting program: /tmp/test
>
> Breakpoint 1, main () at ./test.c:8
> 8 printf("%x\n", A | B);
> (gdb) p A
> No symbol "A" in current context.
Oops, I stand corrected.
> Actually I completely do not care about define or enums, it is really
> silly dispute, I just do not want to rewrite bunch of code _again_ and
> then _again_ when someone decide that defines are better.
ACK. Personally I also do not care that much - as long as it doesn't
change with the phase of the moon.
And we probably do not want
---- snip ----
#ifdef CONFIG_I_LOVE_ENUMS
#define A 1
#define B 2
#define C 4
#else
enum {
A = 1,
B = 2,
C = 4,
};
#endif
---- snip ----
either.
Bernd, shutting now up on this thread
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
Embedded Linux Development and Services
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
