Re: [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option

[Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>]

On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:10 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> the binary search argument in this case is moot, just having a config
> >> option doesn't break anything compile wise and each later step is
> >> self-compiling..
> > 
> > Not true when the config used for the binary search has stack protector
> > enabled.
> >
> oh? I thought I was pretty careful about that
> 
> looking over the patches again I can't find any reason for a non-compiling/working kernel; at any step..

I just compiled each step separately [*] and they all compile just fine,
and will work just fine as well...



[*] <shameless plug>thanks to the 2 1/2 minute full kernel compile time
of my new Intel box with Woodcrest cpus </shameless plug>

-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/