> the binary search argument in this case is moot, just having a config > option doesn't break anything compile wise and each later step is > self-compiling.. Not true when the config used for the binary search has stack protector enabled. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option
- From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option
- References:
- [patch 0/5] -fstack-protector feature for the kernel (try 2)
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- [patch 0/5] -fstack-protector feature for the kernel (try 2)
- Prev by Date: Re: cdev documentation (was Drop second arg of unregister_chrdev())
- Next by Date: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 1/9] extents for ext4
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option
- Index(es):
 |