Re: bootsplash integration

Pavel Machek <[email protected]> writes:

> OTOH all the distros use it, anyway, so integration would make _some_
> sense.

There's some alteratives running well in usermode so I don't think it
makes sense anymore.

I can cite usplash and splashy as examples.

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: [email protected]      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • bootsplash integration
    • From: "Steve Barnhart" <[email protected]>
  • Re: bootsplash integration
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 50/75] net: drivers/net/wan/pci200syn.c pci_module_init to pci_register_driver conversion
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc3-git3 - XFS - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000078
• Previous by thread: Re: bootsplash integration
• Next by thread: Re: bootsplash integration
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]