Ar Iau, 2006-08-17 am 11:45 +0200, ysgrifennodd Pavel Machek: > This should not be it... it also happens on suspend-to-disk according > to the report, and during swsusp we do normal boot so HPA should be > initialized...? The suspend to disk case I've not personally seen. The suspend to ram one I have looked at and seen and verified the HPA was not reset. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- From: Lee Trager <[email protected]>
- Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- References:
- Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- From: Jason Lunz <[email protected]>
- Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- From: Lee Trager <[email protected]>
- Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- Prev by Date: RE: Relation between free() and remove_vm_struct()
- Next by Date: Re: Random scsi disk disappearing
- Previous by thread: Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- Next by thread: Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- Index(es):
 |